Is our Lt Governor capable of walking the walk?

'In general, the Lt. Governor is seen as the custodian of the general interest and carries the responsibility for good governance.'

These words are taken from the Lt. Governors Website where you can find more information about his responsiblities.

Some will say that I am showing disrespect and overstepping boundaries by questioning and criticising the Lt. Governor, I would remind those people that this is a democracy and unless they have information to the contrary, free speech is still free. Richards is not a god, he is not a lord, he is a public servant and as such, as a member of the public, I have the right to question his abilities and commitment to his job. Both are lacking in my opinion.

Click here to Read More
____________________________________________________________

Mr Richards resume details that he was Head of the Island Finance Dept between 1972 and 1979 , an official of the Ministry of Interior Affairs and Kingdom Relations in the Netherlands from 1980 till 1992 and then an administrative lawyer in the service of the Executive Council. In 1996 he became sector director of Support Services of the Government and in 2000 he became Lt Governor.

All of the above are impressive positions, however the underlying story is that since 1972, Mr. Franklin Richards has had a long history of working with the island Govt of SXM, which has nearly always been the DP party. His work and responsibilities have always relied upon an amicable and close relationship with this party and this means that the required impartiality that is a requirement for his position is open to questions and scrutiny.

When Richards entered into office, one of the biggest and most proclaimed items on his agenda was his apparent desire to reform and clean up Island Government with the introduction of a Code of Conduct.. This document , which you can read at the link I have provided, was a step in the right direction in performing the requirements of the Lt. Governor's position, custodian of the public's general interest and good governence.

Problem was, Mr. Richards didn't realise he was facing a brick wall and this first step didn't go very far. His proposed legistlation, which recieved the support of the PPA and the NA, was not very welcome with the DP. When asked about it 3 1/2 years later in September 2005 all Richards had to say was that it was 'still on the table' and he lamented the 'missed opportunity' to counter public doubt about the island government's honesty and integrity.

The only IC member who asked about it was Gracita, she has questioned the delay in reform when it comes to public companies finanicing commissioners pet projects, she has challenged him repeatedly and even asked him just what he thinks his job is. She will be missed, the NA have a great deal to live up to if they want to avoid the label she applied to them of 'The Loyal Opposition'.

These past IC elections and the interesting article written by Suzanne Koelega in the latest issue of the DH Weekender have raised even more questions that need to be asked about our Lt. Governor and his responsibilities towards the democratic process. You can read the whole article here.

Richards response to the issue of vote buying, something that just about everybody in the article agrees was widespread this past election, is that all he has heard is rumors. His comment that those selling their vote lose their voice makes absolutley no sense at all. These 'rumors' of crimes which eat and destroy the very foundations of democracy should not be dismissed off hand as he does, they should, as Romney suggests, be looked into 'without question'.

Richards talks the talk when it comes to reforming the election process, but he is clearly out of touch. On the issue of crowds being outside voting stations he state's that it's a 'cultural' thing and that he sees nothing wrong with it. He apparently visited all the polling stations on election day, perhaps he did so with his eyes closed. At those I passed by, most of the supporters of the DP were immigrants, few even spoke English, let alone Dutch and several told me they had been paid to spend their day there.

Can I prove it? No, I can't, but the rumors are enough for the Governor to be required to investigate, not to dismiss. Richards displays the same thinking as those over in French Side who claim "Cockfighting' is cultural so it's ok to hold one on the waterfront. There are many things in the past that we no longer do today, because we have learnt better of it or we have learnt that there are better ways to do things. Are we to also think that because vote buying has gone on for so long that it is also 'cultural' and be permitted or ignored? There are those who would claim so.

These crowds are not only a distraction, and to some voters a form of intimidation, during what should be a time of thought and clear thinking, but they are also a way for politicians to continue the election campaign into election day. There is no need or justification for these 'rent a mobs', they should be regulated and be limited to 3 or 4 observers from each party.

On the same note, are we also to consider the senseless waste and uglification of our island every election with flags and posters as 'cultural' too? Again, another thing that needs attention.

SXM's election process needs radical reform and legislation if it is to have any credence or future as a progressive, well managed healthy democracy. Is Richards capable ot ensuring this happens before the next elections and new status?

Is Richards capable of walking the talk he talks? So far he has not.

I don't agree with the statement in the previous post, $50,000 question, that the issue of vote buying is closed, I believe that the case should remain open and that electorial reform should be pursued as a priority by the opposition. Not doing so will mean we have the same crap next time around and most likely the same govt.

The PPA are quite right to pursue the issue, it is not sour grapes, it is about dealing with a problem that we all know exists and that endangers the very foundations of our democracy. It's time for Richards to start doing his job.

Hady

Hady Nufyet's blog | add new comment

Submitted by Hady Nufyet on Mon, 2007-04-30 21:53.

SXM to get a 'house cleaning' before new status
Flipper | Tue, 2007-05-01 23:52

From St Martin News Network - 29th April 2007

Philipsburg:- The police department is still busy investigating the suspected fraud case that involves a member of the Peoples Progressive Party.
The PPA candidate was questioned by police earlier this week after police arrested a Haitian National who was in possession of a falsified Permanent Resident Permit. Chief Prosecutor Taco Stein said that the case is still under intense investigation and for this reason he cannot divulge much information to the media.

However, Stein confirmed that the Special Investigators who were on the island for almost one week left the island yesterday on the KLM flight. The chief prosecutor also did not say what cases were being investigated by the Kingdom police; but said that in due time that information will be made available.
Reliable information reaching this media house said that there are a few civil servants that under the microscope and that the Dutch Kingdom Government was to ensure that some house cleaning is done before the island can attain its new status.

Another example about the Governor
Resistencia | Tue, 2007-05-01 11:46

You point out some good examples why this Governor is not functioning well. I have another one: When you consider that the Lt. Governor "is seen as the custodian of the general interest and carries the responsibility for good governance" as his website tells us, one should ask when he will take some initiative to clean up Mullet Bay. Or isn't that in the general interest of our island? This year it will be 12 years after the fact and the place is still in shambles.
None of the elected officials have done a thing to clean it up. It is a disgrace. If it is the governor's task to intervene in the general interest of Sint Maarten, he should be more than ashamed that he didn't. Demolish the buildings, clean up the land and give it back to the people by declaring it a protected green zone. Our neighbors on the French side know how to do it. Why can't he do the same?

PR Act?
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2007-05-01 20:14

I think the comparison to the French way of returning land to people is a bit contrite. Coming from a relative of one of the former interested parties of that land, one of the main reasons it's going 'back to the people' is because of the complete mess of the legal system when it comes to land. Add the passing away of some involved members and french 'zone vert' law and it's easy to see how this is happening. However, the article was absolutely correct in stating that green zones are not respected. By whom you ask? The government and the privileged investors whose networking skills and close ties to government officials allow them to undo certain green zone areas to develop. Just look at some areas on the Eastern part of French St. Martin. And there are more areas to follow soon. Green Zone Policies do not prevent development, it only makes it more difficult and time-consuming to apply for construction permits on these zones. What is more important for us to focus on is to get people en masse to protect these areas once they are considered green zones. An organized, peaceful, and consistent protest movement can put pressure on governments to influence policy.

I think we all know why
Hady Nufyet | Tue, 2007-05-01 12:47

Mr Ansary is a long time supporter of the DP, he is very wealthy, involved with purchasing banks, oil refineries and the media in Curacao. He is, if I recall correctly, the former ambassador to the US for the Shah of Iran, a CIA and US puppet. I don't think it would be far wrong to speculate that he is or was a CIA 'affiliate' too. May still be, he does seem to have a lot of interests down that way near Venezuela.

Roy Marlin and this government do not want to put any restictions or conditions on the redevelopment of Mullet Bay, Ansary would not like that, he expects to be able to do what he wants and our govt will most likely let him as they let just about every other developer do so. Bunch of Pimips is what they are.

Hady

Ansary made himself an Ambassador
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2007-05-01 20:45

Hady,

Try googling Hushang Ansari and see what you come up with.
He was never a real Ambassador, he invented that title for himself. He was Minister of finance under the Shah of Iran.
He also left with the treasury when the Shah was exiled.
Somehow he became the custodian of their wealth, he invested in many companies in the US and overseas.
Most recently he is linked to purchasing Banco Caribe and Ennia in Curacao. Rumors are that he has interest in some takeover of the Venezuela oil refinery there as well.
When he is present on SXM and back in the old Mullet Bay days he would insist that people and staff call him Ambassador.
I have to agree with previous writer where he/she writes that it does not matter for Ansari who is in power, he does not give a rats ass who is in power, he will throw coins to keep any politician as a marionette.
it is indeed the DP and their Commissioners that seek him out for money.
The man wields incredible power almost like a demigod, he is so small of a man that it is hilarious to witness his big time managers like Clarence Derby practically kissing his ass, brown nosing, and rolling out the royal red carpet when he comes to SXM.
Whenever he comes and his idea is to stay incognito, he stays at La Samanna.
Has anyone noticed that Mullet Bay did not come up during the last election? I did not hear the NA nor PPA bring up the issue either.

More Ansary
Calico Jack | Tue, 2007-05-01 23:31

I understand your sceptism about Ansary but he really was ambassador to the U.S.. Read this link for a heavily sugarcoated resume of his highness. I also took the liberty of adding his picture to this site. Just in case the link disappears some day. I bet many amongst you don't know how he looks. Now you do.

Rackham

Ansary and DP?
SXM PE | Tue, 2007-05-01 14:15

It is the other way around. Ansary is not a supporter of the DP. He doesn't give a rat's ass about them. The DP however is a great supporter and admirer of Ansary. If Ansary says jump, they jump. If Ansary says don't jump, they don't. Just like in the circus. And if they obey and perform well, he throws some coins at them. You can read more about the Ansary circus here.
I hear Mullet Bay was sold by him. Anyone out there knows more?

That explains why...
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2007-05-01 13:39

That explains why the elected politicians like Roy and all did not act. But the Governor? Or is he on the take too?

In response to Hady
SXM PE | Tue, 2007-05-01 08:46

Let me start by saying that I agree with your post about Sgt. Governor Richards: the invisible man. As an appointed official he may and should be criticized when there is cause for concern. There is indeed cause for concern and you made some excellent points.

It is not my style to respond to comments. I give my opinion, you may have yours. I make an exception this time with regard to the "case closed" remark you disagree with. I do that as a matter of explanation.

I attribute the success of this site to its style and the knowledge of the many different editors. Matters are exposed where newspapers ignore them. Minimal gossip, chitchat and hardly any violent polemical meeting of the minds (he say, I say) we see on too many message boards.

When I said case closed for now in relation with vote buying accusations, I meant that people should not continue to write about it in the same manner, without really substantiating any of the charges that is. That should be interrupted perhaps unless someone has factual details and examples available to back up what they are saying. Or else the topic may loose credibility. I didn't mean to put it to rest eternally and insofar you and others understood that, I herewith correct that. The aim was to steer it in a different direction not to silence it. Again, that is my opinion but I am not God either. Anyone may think differently.

I too heard about the people that were flown in from all over the world to vote, people getting laptop vouchers for Klass electronics, cash that was distributed and the cars and fridges that were given away but I didn't witness it nor did anybody tell me so. I didn't read that anybody did witness or anybody did hear first hand. That doesn't mean it didn't happen but it remains hearsay. Perhaps reliable hearsay because of the preponderance but still unsubstantiated. A public secret at best.

I think many of us are pretty much convinced that vote buying in some form or manner took place in all elections in the past inlcuding the recent one. It will happen in the future as well and we may have to admit, reluctantly, that it is indeed a cultural thing for many. As despicable as it may be. What bothers me more is the lack of any noticeable action against corruption in the upper crust of the Saint Maarten society. It is mindboggling and scary. The threat of the sword of justice in these echelons is noticeably absent. It is opportunity galore for the generals and other high ranking officers and noboy does anything about it. I said it is class justice and second class justice. I gave the Laveist donation as a clear example. That looks like a cut and dry case to me and I am at a complete loss why it is not investigated . But then again it may be. I have no inside information on these matters and wouldn't know where to get it. Whatever the case may be, Laveist case is substantially different from the accusations about vote buying. Fact against innuendo. One day maybe we can present the vote buying as an ugly fact too and no longer as an innuendo. Innuendos will not help the fight against corruption. Facts hopefully will. A roaring lion kills no game.

My mistake
Hady Nufyet | Tue, 2007-05-01 12:37

Well, not really a mistake, more a lapse, because I think I know you welll enough to read you better. I guess I over reacted a bit, or at least appear to have done, but I attribute that to the fact I was busy writing a post about vote buying and electorial reform when you posted.

My point is that reform is desperately needed if this island is ever going to have accountable and proper governance. Vote buying can be stopped, or at least made much more difficult and risky for those that either buy or sell, as it is right now, who is looking at it? No one as far as we know, yet the 'rumors' and 'stories' we all hear are widespread and I think we can all confidently say that in this case, 'where there is smoke there is fire' seems likely.

When there are rumors or a murder, or a boat missing at sea, or really any crime, it is the duty of the authorites to investigate those rumors, if only to prove them false. These 'rumors' undermine the very foundations of the voting process and democracy, by not confronting it it is being condoned. This is not culture, it is fraud and crime being ignored and left to run rampant, like so many other crimes on SXM.

Throwing water in Jouvert could be called cultural, but because it affects other people detrimentally, ie getting wet, it has been stopped. Driving with your child in the front seat could be called cultural, but we have learned that back seats, preferably children's seats are much better, most countries have laws about it. In Europe in the middle ages they used to throw their sewage water out the window, perhaps there were some in those days that wanted to continue doing it, claiming it was their culture to do so.

I don't accept the 'Cultural' excuse being used, I see it as a cop out from having to confront the big social issues and problems and making progress as a community and society. Still waters will soon stagnate.

I don't expect the NA to fight very hard for reforms, so who will? What SXM really needs is an SXM MoveOn or SXM Civil Liberties Union who will watch out for the general interest and proper governance of the people. It's plainly clear to me that neither the Lt Governor or the Main Stream Media are doing this, or are capable.

All we can do at this time it write about it, try to bring attention to the issue and not let it be forgotten or put on the shelf to think about later. Next year, if there are no reforms then we will have the same thing all over again. As LH say's above, the best way to stop it is for some brave souls to start carrying recorders. I got mine at boolchands, but I see a few online that look more discrete.

Again though, it shouldn't be up to citizens to do this, it is the job of authorities to investigate where crimes are suspected. There is a serious problem with this 'only if someone makes a complaint' requirement. We see it in cases of domestic violence, where the victim doesn't want to make one, often through fear. Who seriously expects or believes the authorities here could or would protect anyone who did so, it's not possible. If the person who the complaint is about doesn't get you then their friends or family will. So, these unstable and violent individuals are left unchallenged and are in our community continuing their abusive and violent behavior.

It shouldn't require vigilante civilian investigators, the authorites and justice officials should be doing their job. Richards is Chief of Police, top dog here on the island, but responsibility and accountability goes all the way up the chain to the top, we should be looking and questioning those further up too.

Election reform is something I'm going to try to write about often over the next 18 months, and if the NA and PPA don't get on the case then they will come under my fire too.

Again, I know you don;t think it is an issue to be swept under the carpet or forgotten about, you are quite right that if some would come forward then it would make the whole case much stronger. But as I see it, it is strong enough and important enough to demand and require an investigation and reform, instead of the brush off the Richards gives it.

Problem is, there are just too many things that deserve writing about, all as important at the next. As I mentioned in my comment on your post, I agree that answers should be demanded, just what has the 'New Hope Foundation (SXM) done withe the GGV money?

Hady

Vote buying not unique to SXM
Anonymous (not verified) | Wed, 2007-05-02 18:00

Flipper, Hady, and readers

Thought you might find this article interesting. I know some of you disagree with the cultural reason, however, it is interesting to see that vote buying also occurs in the Bahamas, where they are having their elections today Wednesday.

Click here for story

Don't see vote buying mentioned
Calico Jack | Wed, 2007-05-02 19:41

Don't see vote buying mentioned in the link you provided. You?

Rackham

some more articles on vote buying bahamas
Anonymous (not verified) | Thu, 2007-05-03 09:19

sorry about that. was reading many articles and pasted the wrong one. here's brief mention of it. i wanted to raise the point that the topics/accusations are the same there as well. vote buying, sellling land to foreigners, etc

Here and Here and Here

this last article mentions a similar action taken in bahamas where mobiles were banned. the similarities are obvious.

I too ask for Proof
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2007-05-01 09:50

I think you saw a post on this site where I asked for proof, even asking someone who commented on this site to post their email so I can contact them to see if they have proof. A photograph is on this site where people were lining up the day before election to collect from Theo Heyliger. That photograph should still be on site and that is one proof to investigate; but the Governor and police who said vote buying is a crime Turned a Blind Eye. I actually called the police to ask them what they are going to do about this International Crime and the Police Told me " Well no one made a Complain and I should not start trouble. Actually it seems the law on SXM says the only way the Governor can investigate is if someone filed an official Complaint to him. My sugeestion is if someone is willing to do that; then do so, send copies of the complaint to:-

* Prosecutors Office SXM
* Attorney General Curacao
* MInister of Justice
* Kingdom Relations in the Hague and Even the Queen.
This way Stein would have to do his job and the Governor.

Quite Right
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2007-05-01 08:41

I am actually Glad that you took the opportunity to write this post... As you well introduced all the functions and jobs Richards held prior to being appointed Governor, it behooves me to say that is the sole reason there is CORRUPTION! The Governor is too comfortable; he has been attached to the SXM Disfunct Government for FAR too long. As a Kingdom Representative Richards should be Rotated into Different parts of the Kingdom so that there is less risk of Friendliness and Good Governanace.
The Governor promised a lot about the cellular phones in phone booths; and the signs that were to be placed up in the booths. Did any one of you see that? I did not See any, the police that were in the booths did at time the police ask or tell anyone to turn off their phone. No that did not happen.
To say the issue of VOTE Buying is closed is absurd, the only reason we are not hearing about this is because the NA is as guilty as the DP; I sincerly hope that PPA would move to the Courts to have this Election Process Overturned. Maurice Scot said the law was broken at booth no 9 where there were only two people in the Booth, I read this on SMN News and the TODAY' The question is why NO ONE; NO MEDIA; All these Talk SHOW host raised this point and talk about this... I guess because they all make BIG MONEY during the Campaign. Someone told me to Get on Oral Gibbs you had to have $10,000.

I think you are right
Local Hero | Tue, 2007-05-01 11:26

About the NA being as guilty as the DP, it doesn't really matter who did it the most either, once is a time too many. It was pointed out here that Richards cell phone plan to have people switch them off was a joke, who does he think he is fooling?

It can be fixed, it can be fixed by people starting to carry microphones and recorders, it can be fixed by whistleblowers sending sites like this information and documents. Vote buying is a very very serious crime that undermines the whole democracy, it must be stopped and it can be. At the end of the day though, isn't it the job of authorities to investigate crimes, even rumors of crimes?

Mr. Richards, do your job, or make room for someone who can.

Local Hero

Vote buying??
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2007-05-01 12:32

It is so strange how in all the years I have been voting on this island nobody has offered me one nickle for my vote ever. Politicians have asked me for my support, but never offered anything in exchange.

And as long as no one has actual proof of it happening it is melee and nothing more than that.

If the Laveist Foundation is culpable for accepting a gift, so are many other foundations that support the campaigns of politicians. Like that foundation of Marietje Buncamper, handing out money and computers all over the place. That money must have come from somewhere. Or did she win the jackpot somewhere?

As long as there is no law that forces politicians to expose the way their campaigns are financed and how the moneys they receive were distributed there will never be any change.

As for the "tis our culture" remark. That is such absolute balony. On Sint Maarten it is customary to excuse bad behaviour with the same argument. Like getting drunk in public, womanizing all over the place, women whoring themselves out, and so on........... Some men even boast it is a legacy from slavery time..........

Let us face the real issue at hand: Sint Maarten people are a people of beggars. They always want something for nothing. And when it is a vote they have, and someone wants to give them money for it, they don't have a problem. For them it is normal. Tis like a thief that starts of small and gets away with it...... it emboldens him, and he will move on to bigger things until he gets caught with his pants down.

Zo, dat lucht op................

Only Melee?
Hady Nufyet | Tue, 2007-05-01 13:01

How can it only be melee when you clearly acknowledge that there are serious issues and problems in the rest of your comment? I'm not seeking an argument with you, but I contend that it is more than melee and if the authorities really wanted to confront and expose it they could. They just don't want to, for a variety of reasons. Like I said above, there is no one really digging into it or looking anyway.

You are right, as long as there are no laws and no threat of consequences for breaking those laws then nothing will change. Are the political parties going to bring about this change? Only if the people, or enough people demand it.

I demand it, I want my vote to count. SXM has often been called the "wild West' of the Caribbean, anything goes. That was nice and even quant once upon a time, now it is not, times have changed, the world has changed.SXM needs to change to have a real future.

Hady

Nation of Beggars
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2007-05-01 21:52

We are a nation of beggars....

the people expect to get something for doing nothing... demanding that land be given away for free to a certain lazy group.. not paying their rents to government owned buildings...

asking for a bail out from politicians for the water bill, when the night before they spent their cash at the casino and they just made a 30,000 dollar loan for a car they don't need....

we have selfish people on this island,,, its not a surprise that we also have selfish politicians as a result.... And why would DP or NA want to change that? The DP can stay in power and the NA can sleep every 4 years..

We need to change the mentality.

PPA is the only hope for that change. We need some serious camera footage of this vote buying nonsense...

Nation of beggars? Who are the real beggars?
Anonymous (not verified) | Wed, 2007-05-02 20:47

You all should take a look at elections all over the world and you will see that money plays a role in ALL elections and yes even in Holland!

For instance in France, money has been playing a huge role forever there, just ask the right questions in for instance the immigrant communities in Paris.

Anyway the bottom line is, if we all say that we want serious change, then the community should demand it and they can do so by groups proposing and publishing legislation to bring order and also avoid whoring themselves for money and gifts.

However, one big question comes to my mind, are the TAX payers of SXM ready to pay for election reform? A reform in which the majority of campaign funds are paid from the government coffers and limited from the community at large, like it is in many western countries.

And finally, the beggars you all talk about today ARE NOT SXM'ers. The real SXM'ers (not naturalized ones) are by far the minority in accepting election funds, just do your home work and you all will see this is true.

So please we are NOT a nation of beggars, so STOP disrespecting my people!

Nation of immigrant beggers maybe?
Local Hero | Thu, 2007-05-03 01:18

Perhaps it could be better said, but I think you are over reacting just a little with the disrespect issue, for all you know the post could be written by a local. When you put the discussion in context it does not appear to be deliberately and intentionally disrespectful to me, more like a lament.

Sure money plays a roll in all elections around the world, but there are different levels and having laws and enforcement can and does limit it greatly, the intention is to make corruption and bribary more difficult, in SXM they do not. It's like no one cares to look into it, it's 'Cultural'. Why do so many people make the claim that because someone else does it that it's ok for us, or just how things are. I also don't buy the cultural claims.

Tax payers are rarely WILLING to pay any more than they have to, they all try to pay as little as possible. Is St. Maarten willing to pay for a fully staffed, fully equiped and trained police force? Or more ambulances, or cleaner energy, or a sewage plant?

Taxes are the foundation of any government, without them there is little they can do, the trick is spread out the taxation fairly and spend it wisely. Taking Sweden as an example, they have high taxes, but they also have complete healthcare, social care and service, an efficent police force, high quality education and schools, etc etc

It does not have to cost the taxpayer a great deal, just by putting limits on signage would cut costs. I think the legislation should be focused on limiting public contributions and making the party accounts public and accountable, in particular these so called foundations everybody has.

It all depends what the puiblic wants, to live on the cheap or not. I myself have no problem paying taxes if they are used wisely and if I (the public) benifit from them. I myself would prefer to pay 2% more tax and have health coverage, 1% more and have better schools, 1% more and have a cleaner environment. There is money that can be raised on St Maarten, I would say it is mainly in the housing market, which needs cooling down anyway, and also in the luxury goods imports.

LH

Well put!
Anonymous (not verified) | Thu, 2007-05-03 19:44

LH your response has proven to me that you are a decent person, however what I dont understand is why most of the threads have to be so negative and bashing on this site, rather than the positive and helpfull outline that you gave in your response to me.

I will keep hoping for the best and yes our society has to stop accepting unlawfull behavior!

Thanks.

are you from space
Anonymous (not verified) | Thu, 2007-05-03 23:10

this is a blog created to spill the ills of this community, something newspers dont touch... if you are not ready for reality then jump ship

From Space?
Anonymous (not verified) | Sat, 2007-05-05 08:06

Reality? Who's reality? Yours?

Your comment shows me that YOU are from space and that you missed my point totally. Moreover the undertone of your comment prooves that some people misuse this website and medium to further their personal agendas under the cloak of solving the "problems of the society".

Why dont you get a life! Cause spilling your beans and telling all your pitifull stories here will not solve the problems of our society.

Fact is, if you look good at the biggest so called community activitist today, MOST if not all of them are angry because they didnt get "setup from Govt.", the current and past Govt's.

I dont ask Govt. for nothing, thats my norm.

That we have problems, YES some serious ones too! All hands on deck lets start meaningfull disgussion and solutions of the problems and not personal attacks and in general MELE that sometimes is the case on this website.

User login

Navigation

Poll

Is Louie Laveist exercising Good Judgement?
Yes
19%
No
81%
Total votes: 21

Recent comments

Browse archives

« December 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Syndicate

XML feed