Cell phones and voting booths

Lt. Governor Franklin Richards has finally made a decision about cell phones and voting booths. In order to prevent people from using them to photograph their ballot and then claim payment for their vote, he has decided that they must be switched off before entering the booth.

Another great decision for democracy?

Click here to Read More
____________________________________________________________

Does Mr. Richards realise that the same button used to switch a cell phone off, also switches it back on, usually within a matter of seconds?

The Daily Herald thinks this a a good decison, claiming that to require people to leave their cell phones at the election officials desk would open a can of worms? What can of worms that is I don't know. Are they saying that election officials can't be trusted to look after voters cell phones while they vote? But they can be trusted to run an election?

The only thing a voter needs to be taking into a voting booth is a pen.

It's par for the course really, Richards also thinks voting machines are a good idea.

Dr. Voodoo

Dr. Voodoo's blog | add new comment

Submitted by Dr. Voodoo on Mon, 2007-04-02 06:50.

Drinking of Alcohlic Beverages can be disatrous.
larrygeer | Tue, 2007-04-03 06:57

The real problem is is not tht we have not any problems in the past 5 years, the real main concern is, a drunk can be manipulated into a promise for a vote and when he awakens from the hangover the next morning, naturally his mind is foggy. This is just another way of buying votes. I personally think that if one appears to be intoxiccated they shoud not be allowed in the voting booth. One is supposed to be in their right mind to vote, not an altered mind.

Alcohol and elections
Local Hero | Tue, 2007-04-03 08:50

A question. Is it 'drinking alcohol' that was banned, or just the selling of it. I always thought the ban was not only pathetically nieve. but also an insult to the people of the island.

On the nieve part, anyone who wants to drink alcoholon election day can do so, they either just buy the alcohol the day before, or they drive over to the French side. I also saw it as an insult, basically saying to the people we don't think you are capable of acting as adults so we must take alcohol away from you.

Certainly a requirement of somekind would be good, for bar owners and bar tenders to have some measure of common sense judgement when it comes to serving people already drunk, and not just on election day. But if someone wants to drink, they can. I think the stigma of having party members drunk and causing problems will also play a part in making sure we don't have drunk fights and problems with some self regulation.

There may be some reason or cause to restrain drunk voters from voting, but I also think that it should only be in extreme cases, where aggression or disturbance issues arise. Denying someone their vote is serious matter.

I don't think the lifting of the alcohol ban will be a problem.

LH

Alcohol use during Election Fay
larrygeer | Tue, 2007-04-03 09:21

Dear LH

My intention was not to take away the God and Democtatic priviledge, but my concern was tht when an Addict (wheaather it be alcohol, dugs, etc. they loose time and it is alwsy one more drink, one more hit, one line and one looses time. My concern was that would they make it to the polls in a soberly manner.

Gracita is delighted
Flipper | Tue, 2007-04-03 01:54

Apparently she isn't too concerned that cell phones have an on/off switch and is happy to accept this half assed poor decision by Richards.

St Maarten News Network

GRACITA CONGRATULATES LT. GOVERNOR For ENFORCING THE LAW

Philipsburg:- Leader of the Peoples Progressive Party Gracita Arrindell in a press release said that far too long the society has allowed corrupt politicians and their agents and collaborators to pollute and taint the election process by buying and selling of votes.

Arrindell stated that “vote buying and vote selling is a crime and has always been a crime that must be stopped if there is to be a progressive and enlightened society. The said society have allowed a small island as St. Maarten to be on sale for many years during the Island Council and Federal Government elections.

"When the people sell their vote for a stove, a fridge, a utility bill paid or receive something else of value including cash, in exchange for your vote, our people are giving away a prized and cherished right that was earned after many years of pain and struggle of our forefathers. You deserve better. the release states.

During 2003 and 2006, Arrindell said she wrote a letter to the Lt. Governor, the Chief Commissioner of Police and the Public Prosecutor asking that they take action because of the long history of these practices and the impact these practices have on a free and fair election’.

She said that he facts are not unknown to the people of this island that voters come into Government Buildings and Faction Offices to collect money and other things of value, in exchange for their vote, from public officials and persons acting on their behalf. She said that very frequently she is told of political parties canvassing in the neighborhoods and offering and giving voters, in exchange for their vote, money or other things of value including US 50 dollars food vouchers, to vote for a specific candidate or political party. Since voter fraud and vote buying and selling go to the very heart of a democratic society, she said she is delighted at this first step of outlawing the taking of pictures and the use of cell phones in polling stations.

This action by the Lt. Governor and the Main Voting Bureau confirms, in the clearest terms possible, that vote buying and selling taints the ballot and compromises the will of the people of this island. It is no secret that one or more political parties on this small island manage and elaborate schemes of voter fraud and vote buying and selling by recording names and amounts or things of value.”

“The outlawing of picture taking in the voting booth means these corrupt politicians will not now know whether the votes they purchased were in fact voted as promised. This banning of picture taking will mean that the people can vote their will and their choices without fear of reprisal.” Arrindell said.

“She said she also call on the Public Prosecutor to use its investigative resources to arrest persons who violate the election law by either offering to make a payment for a vote or accepting a payment for a vote in this all important Island Council election. We also call upon the Public Prosecutor to issue statements advising the public that vote buying and vote selling is a crime and that its office will punish persons for violating the election laws.”

Gracita is delighted
larrygeer | Tue, 2007-04-03 06:50

Hi Gracita:

Appartenlty the practice i spreading to the National Alliance. I was told by her that she mentioned to a slate member of the National Alliance and aksed if we would offer the same. I told her voting was a god given tight and if she were one who praciced her religion as she has to me, then she knows it is wrong. I told her nothing in life is free, we all pay the piper, and the piper plays to a different tune to what the people really need. The stove will rot, but our children need to be educatied and have activities to dfo,, to keep them out of trouble. She is from Curaco and should know better.

Regards,

Larry C. Geer
Member PPA

P.S. I personally think tht drinking of alcoholic beverages on Election day is in poor taste. I cam imagine a drunk can be scammed into promises , that of course will not be delivered.

Alcohol Ban
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2007-04-03 13:20

I do not think that people who have had a few (or even more than a few) will be scammed into promises, any more than they would be scammed into promises when they are sober. If you are gullible enough to believe the promises made by a politician, you will do so whether you are inebriated or not.

I do think that going from such a strict ban to none at all is quite a drastic measure however; I do not believe that it will have an effect on the outcome whatsoever.

User login

Navigation

Poll

Is Louie Laveist exercising Good Judgement?
Yes
19%
No
81%
Total votes: 21

Recent comments

Browse archives

« December 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Syndicate

XML feed