Place your bets!!

Mullet Bay Thread

Recently a partial ruling was made in the Mullet Bay case in which the judge ruled that Sun Resorts had not provided sufficient information concerning the insurance money from the destruction of the resort in 1995 Luis.

Read More below.
____________________________________________________________

As someone who does remember this resort in its heyday, when almost 600 St. Maarteners were employed there, it's a relief finally to see some movement in this case, particulary as it seems to be moving in favor of the owners. Not that I hold out much hope that, when the resort is rebuilt, it will resemble what was there before. Ansari apparently wants to build big block condo style buildings close to the beach.

If there is anyone out there who would be interested in writing a summary of this case and its history it would be very helpful. Feel free to comment or "spread rumors" if you feel so inclined. ;)

Local Hero

Local Hero's blog | add new comment

Submitted by Local Hero on Mon, 2006-02-27 22:02.

RSTF traded on the otc stock exchange
Anonymous (not verified) | Fri, 2007-09-28 15:59

September 12th SunResorts LTD/Mullet bay resorts traded shares on the stock exchange. Is something big going to happen?

Can you explain to us how trading works?
Anonymous (not verified) | Sat, 2007-09-29 12:06

The Mullet Bay saga is now 12 years and running..... so many are interested in this story it warrants a published book. Can you explain for us how trading works on the stock exchange? who benefits and in the case of Sun resorts-the former Mullet Bay resort what can/will./may/ happen in this case.

Sint Maarten cannot under any circumstances right now handle a new development for Mullet Bay with all the over development taking place around every corner. The massive over development is causing deplorable roads, construction trash everyhwre, poor infrastructure, escalating crime from too many persons residing legally and illegaly on the island with a poor functioning police and immigration control.

Pollution from construction trucks and large construction vehicules on the road during daytime. Adding more development in the form of highrises at the Mullet bay beach and taking away one of the few open accessible beaches to tourists staying at other resorts, people visitng on cruises and the general residential population will cause a upheaval to say the least. The people also want parking for their vehicules nearby the Mullet Bay beach and the people deserve every wish they may have in the Mullet Bay saga as the property owners have left the area abandonded, with building carcasses for everyone to see 12 yrs later, with dark areas that have become crime infested holes in that part of the island.
And people are still wondering why the Mullet Bay was not an issue in the last election, not even the opposing parties brought up this story. In the meantime we are honoring Mr. Ansari with permits to operate banks (Banco caribe) Insurance Companies (ENNIA) and him and his people getting involved with Isla on Curaco. Rumours have it that he has partnered with Y's former Prime Minister, Tromp head of the central bank and Judge de Lanoy.

How S8 trades work
Anonymous (not verified) | Sun, 2007-09-30 12:07

It is called Insider Trading
Trading of securities by a person who by the nature of his or her position has access to inside information about a corporation's plans. And who takes advantage of what he or she knows for personal profit, before information becomes public.

Some History, a small summary and my opinion.
Anonymous (not verified) | Thu, 2006-03-02 05:21

By Jeroen Veen - attorney at law

Mullet Bay is structured in a rather unconventional manner. The history goes way back, but I pick it up in the eighties when the whole area we today know as Mullet Bay was owned by Island Gem Enterprises Ltd. All buildings we used to know as the Mullet Bay Hotel were by then already built in the different areas of the property such as the stores, reception area, casino and nightclub and the now infamous apartment buildings amongst others. Together they were operated as the Hotel. Most of the dilapidated apartment buildings were leased out long term to the so called “home-owners”; a misleading qualification as these individuals were not and are not owners in the real meaning of the word but nevertheless. The owners are organized in an association: The Mullet Bay Apartment Association.

In 1983 a legal structure was designed to give these owners some legal protection until the units were condo-minimized and title could be transferred. It was not such a bad idea to protect the owners. The leased units were part of a hotel operation and belonged to the operator and as such they could have been lost in the event of bankruptcy (or litigation) of the entity that operated the hotel. Had the hotel gone bankrupt, all the units that were meant to be owned by others (but were actually leased out) would have been part of a bankruptcy as well and that needed to be prevented.

For most apartment buildings a certificate of admeasurement was made; some 45 in total each describing an area varying from 600 to 2000 square meters with an apartment building standing thereon. In November 1983 both Island Gem and the Mullet Bay Apartment Association incorporated a foundation. The foundation was named Foundation for the Protection of Tourist Investments. The foundation was never registered in the register of the Chamber of Commerce on Sint Maarten. The board of the foundation was formed by officials from both Island Gem and the Apartment Association. From the incorporating document we learn that members of the board were: Ted Allen, George Mayer, Kamal Alsultany, Johan Schepisi and Mohammed Khaleeli. Since the foundation is not registered, it is unclear who the boardmembers currently are.

To complete the protective plans, all 45 parcels of land with apartment buildings were transferred to this Foundation with the obligation to recognize the long term leases. The intended condo-minimization of units never took place. Today the Foundation still is the registered owner of the 45 parcels of land with the apartment buildings. There are not many people who know this. I even doubt if all the Owners know.

In September 1995 hurricane Luis hit Sint Maarten with tremendous force and destroyed most of our Island including the Mullet Bay hotel. And although the foundation was set up to prevent exposing the title, the lease rights and security interest of the apartment units to the business risk of the hotel operator, no provisions were made for natural disasters. As a part of normal hotel operation, the operator –by then Sunresorts Ltd- had insured the (entire) property. It was therefore named as the beneficiary on the policy which is the reason why the insurance proceeds were paid out to them. Sunresorts had always charged the owners a pro rate share of the insurance premium for the coverage of their unit and the owners thus claimed a part of the insurance proceeds to rebuild their apartments. Unfortunately parties have substantially different views with regard to the division of the insurance proceeds. In a nutshell, that is the subject of their litigation.
To make things more complicated, Sunresorts filed for protection from its creditors. In the U.S. that would be described as “chapter 11”. We call it a morotorium of payment. I will not comment on the reasons why this situation has lasted so long. It is as it is and it means that Sunresorts can not be forced to pay their creditors. In a couple of months the court on Sint Maarten has to make a new decision if the morotorium will be be further extended.

It is now March 2006 and the dispute over the insurance money is still not solved. The litigation is only in the beginning stages. On February 14, 2006 the court on Sint Maarten ruled in favor of the homeowners and awarded 11 million dollars and change to the owners. Not one newsspaper reported this important fact. Sunresorts has already indicated to appeal this decision and I would not be surprised if the case will see all court rooms of our Appeal Court and Supreme Court before it will be over. Justice should have its course I guess. But justice should also have its course for the people of Sint Maarten. Irrespective of the dispute, both Sunresorts and the Owners Association should have had the decency to at least clean up the ruins that we still face every day. And because they didn’t, Government should have intervened. It is just not right what Sunresorts and the Owners did to the Island and it is not right how our Government responded.

The court ruling of the 14th may have a serious impact from a different angle. I intentionally use the word “may” as nothing in law is certain. But through this court ruling, the owners may now have obtained the status of creditor of Sunresorts. Creditors can vote on an extension of the morotorium. Large creditors have important and at times decisive votes. The joint owners are by far the largest creditor of Sunresorts if they will be recognized as such. What will happen at the next hearing on the morotorium is uncertain but I doubt that the mortorium will be further extended if the owners have it their way. That does not neccessarily mean the war is over. I guess it will take much more than that.

Thank you very very much!
Flipper | Thu, 2006-03-02 07:46

For your summary Jeroen,

It explains so much for us all.

Flipper

Jeroen Veen - thank you
Anonymous (not verified) | Thu, 2006-03-02 14:57

Thank you very much for the explanation regarding Mullet Bay Resort. Finally someone came forward with something that actually makes some sense.

By the way,do you have any info on Le Flamboyant Resort in Nettle Bay on the French side of the island. I believe the present owner is suing the previous owner for millions of Euros for a faulty construction.Since Le Flamboyant is also a combination of hotel and condos,could the settlement,if any,be also given to the present owner and the condo owners might be out of luck?

I was thinking of purchasing one of the condos,therefore,I am interested in this issue.

Thanks,Janelle

Mullet Bay! finally some explanations
Anonymous (not verified) | Thu, 2006-03-02 10:01

After readind the summary by Mr. Veen, I must say that a whole lot has been explained and I now wonder if he has now opened a can of worms.
The foundation not registered? the so- called home owners not really home owners? the apartments really owned by a foundation? where are the persons who set up the foundation?
I do know that Mr. Kamal Alsultani passed away a few years ago.
I do know that Schepesi represents the home owners in the dispute, however with this 11 million dollar settlement, will the homeowners just want the money and forget St.Maarten? I even wonder if they knew about the settlement.
With this new information, will the court now ask for the people who set up the foundation to come forward?

Ant then I still wonder why Ansari has been so involved in Curacao lately with buying banks and insurance companies, what is his motive?
In the long end, it is the people of SXM that has suffered, looking at those eyesores for so long.
Mullet Bay is a great area, I am in favour of keeping it as it is without the dilapitated buildings.
Golf, tennis, walking, running, cycling, roller hockey,basket ball,volley ball on the beach,a play ground for kids with an ice cream stand, this can be the new Mullet Bay Park.

User login

Navigation

Poll

Are you more inclined to give your business and money to environmentally and socially aware companies?
Yes, absolutey.
82%
When possible I prefer to.
14%
Not bothered.
4%
Who cares, never.
0%
Total votes: 28

Browse archives

« October 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Syndicate

XML feed