St Maarten Island Government Beaches Policy ...

This is an older un dated document that someone gave to me, but it is not that old because it is signed by former Lt. Governor Denis Richardson. But to these day it almost seems like a joke and show how far this government is going and went in the disrespect of US the people.... this policy should be implemented for DAWN BEACH, CUPECOY, GIBBS BAY, and in a very close future GUANA BAY , etc....

Read More below.
____________________________________________________________

"PUBLIC NOTICE

The Executive Council of the Island Territory of Sint Maarten hereby makes known that they have established a policy concerning the use of beaches.

The policy state that :

1. the beaches must be useable for everyone, both local residents and tourists alike, for recreative purposes.

2. developments that , physically, have a negative influence on the recreative use of the beaches, will be opposed.

3. the beaches will be protected against natural and human influences, that sever their recreational and natural function.

The policy concerns :

The strip of sand with a width of at most 50 meters, of which the surface consist of natural seasand situated along the sea, or in absence of natural seasand, the strip of land with a width of 25 meters from the high-waterline, situated along the public waters.

The consequence of this policy are that the Island government will strive to ensure that :

ad1: The beach are openly accessible for the general public, which means that there must be a wide access that is free from physical and mental barriers ( levers, hotels, etc.)

ad2 : no construction works or activities, that occupy the space on the beach in a way that restrict normal use of the beach for others, will occur on the beach. The standpoint of the Island Government is that, construction works on the beach are annoying and disfiguring to the surroundings. It is not desirable for dwelling, hotels, businesses, etc. to be built or situated on the beach.

ad3 : the beaches will be protected against pollution, disturbance, destruction, etc., and again erosion, hurricanes, etc.

Summary :

The main objective of the policy is protection of the recreational value of the beaches. Besides that, the nature value of the beaches should be protected as much as possible. If necessary the nature value of (a) certain beach (es) can, possibly temporary, be placed above the recreational value.

Consequently, in the future the Island Government will not permit construction works or activities on the beach, unless justified by special circumstances. These special circumstances must be in the general interest of the island.

The Executive Council of the Island Territory of Sint Maarten
The (act.) Is, Secretary, R.A. Boasman
The Lt. Governor, D.L. Richardson"

I THINK WE SHOULD REMIND THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE CLAIMING THERE IS NO BEACH POLICY IN PLACE TO REGULATE THE DEVELOPMENT!!!!!!

beachgoer's blog | add new comment

Submitted by beachgoer on Thu, 2005-09-15 22:00.

Dawn Beach markers removed
Anonymous (not verified) | Mon, 2008-11-10 08:30

Kadaster department visited the site and placed markers on the beach...
more here

Do you have a date for this policy?
Flipper | Fri, 2005-09-16 06:21

It occurs to me too that the recent decision by Lt Governor Richards to send the EXCO's approval of Dunes Casino in Caravanserai to be annuled could also be applied here. That story which hasn;t yet been posted here on SXM PE, but will be, says that that there is a Policy stating that no more stand alone casinos will be allowed. This means Caravanserai have to build thier 200 rooms before they can open the casino.

So, if the Lt Governor is "enforcing" policies, then the one above should also be enforced too.

I will get the Casino story posted in the next day or two. Many thanks for the post with the information Beachgoer.

Published in the Today's newspaper
beachgoer | Mon, 2005-09-19 15:19

The Today's newspaper published an editorial this morning regarding this policy who arrived on their desk on Friday afternoon, after I paid an unsuccesfull visit to the internal affairs and the dept of policies and research at the vineyar building to have an official dated copy of it ...and obviously couldn't get any. It seems to be dated from 1999, but I don't have the exact date yet, as researches in the Guardians archives at the library are long, very long. And you are extremly right, if some policy are being enforced why not this one?? This is also exactly why, it was brought to the attention of the media , so the government will have a little bit of explaination to give, before trying to bury it, and before writing a new one more appropriate to their friends the developpers. On the other hand I have no knowledge of the content of the hillside policy, but I beleive if it was published and brought to the attention of the public by the media, the environmental groups and foundation will have a much easier life, and will be abble to do an even greater job than what they already do. Lets hope, and wait to see where it goes...

this is a policy not a law
Jadira Veen (not verified) | Fri, 2005-09-16 15:18

In my opinion, this is a policy just like the Hillside Policy.

It is a policy which means one can refer to it but cannot use it as law. It has to be ratified. The Hillside Policy for example has been sitting there for years, I believe just like this beach policy.

I do believe I have seen parts of this beach policy and some parts of it has to be ammended. I remember there is something about Jet Skis that was not quite right.

But, the government is not seeking to ammend and make any changes to both these polcies and make them efficient either. They just sit there and when it is convenient for them to refer to them they do, and when it is not, well it is not because they are not law. And these polices do not have a fine attched to if anyone breaks the rule, I think.

These policies have to be reviewed, ammended and a stiff fine attched for violations.

Jadira
PRIDE foundation

User login

Navigation

Poll

Is Louie Laveist exercising Good Judgement?
Yes
29%
No
71%
Total votes: 14

Recent comments

Browse archives

« November 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
            1
3 5 6 8
11 12 13 14
16 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Syndicate

XML feed