The Merit Group vs The Telem Group - PDF document

Joe Richardson is probably very happy he found an excuse to walk away from the Telem board. He leaves a troubled company behind. Being sued is a nuisance. Being sued in a New York state court for 2.3 million dollar is more than a nuisance. It is already a costly affair in terms of lawyer’s fees and the risk for Telem to lose this fight and go under is substantial. Elected state court judges have a tendency to be favorable to the American voter. Telem is not an American voter. Their adversary is.

They want Telem to pay $ 2.3 million in damages and lawyer fees because the phone company breached a contract. It concerns a Citi bank financing deal for 78 million that was secured in 2007 by the Merit Group out of New York. All was ready to go but the Telem board members headed by Joe, started dragging their feet and ultimately backed out of the deal that was supposed to be signed, sealed and delivered after 2 years of negotiations. That is what the complaint of the Merit Group reads and that is what Joe conveniently walked away from. Remarkable that he forgot to mention this in his resignation letter.

You can find the PDF of the law suit below.

Click here to Read More
____________________________________________________________

A couple of years of litigation over a 2.3 million claim in a New York court is like driving a Ferrari. It is a thrill but quite an expensive one. So it may be a lot cheaper for Telem to pay the Merit guys and get this over with. Can Telem afford that? No they can’t but they probably introduce some rate hike and charge us for this adventure. So ultimately it is you and me that pay for the incompetence of Joe and his gang. What else is new on Saint Maarten? Well, really new would be if Joe will be sued and confronted with the consequences of his actions if there is reason to do so. And if need be, presented with the bill. Being on a board is not only about fancy trips, corporate goodies and meeting once a week over coffee.

We'd love any legal minds out there to share their opinions, also, it seems the may have been some hanky panky going on under Meyers, perhaps that's why he got out? Anyone got any info to share on this?

LH

AttachmentSize
Verified Complaint.pdf365.03 KB

Local Hero's blog | add new comment

Submitted by Local Hero on Thu, 2008-06-19 03:33.

Meritless (repost)
George MacGee | Fri, 2008-06-20 11:58

Let me describe a scenario for the readers here at SXMPE. In 2005 the then management of Telem and Smitcoms were desperate to find financing to refinance the group's existing loans with several local banks on St. Maarten.

Telem alone needed to consolidate and refinance $20 million dollars in outstanding loans. Telnet needed $2 million and Tellcell needed over $5 million. Smitcoms desperately needed $11 million to finance phase two of its Caribbean Fiber Cable Network.

No new money was forthcoming from the locals banks (WIB and RBTT) and Smitcoms had contractual obligations to fulfil. Hence the desperate need to find financing elsewhere and find it fast.

Management traveled on several occasions to the USA to meet several financial brokers and investors and in desperation even went to Cuba, the route often traveled by many Antillian corporate leaders in financially dire straits.

All the while the banks in St. Maarten stood by idly on the side looking on and laughing at the amateurish and infantile attempts of Telem to secure financing for the company's debt consolidation elsewhere through a host of brokers and financial institutions, some legit, some semi-legit and some down-right illegitimate.

Obviously the case of Merit vs Smitcom is a direct result of the scrambling and desperation of Telem Group of Companies to enter into agreement with every and any financial services broker to find financing to cover the gapping holes in the companies' finances as a direct result of all the waste, squandering, corruption, embezzlements and defrauding these companies had to withstand because the powers that be at the time drained the group's resources for their own private gains and personal enrichment.

(Sidebar: In this light. it is easy to give loads of donations when the money is not yours nor can be accounted for. For years, outside accountants refused to sign off on Telem's Group of Companies financial reports and statements.)

Apparently, from the Merit complaint (point 9), the financing need had risen to $78 million dollars.

Ofcourse, when the local banks found the timing right, they stepped in and refinanced the outstanding loans and offered new financing for the Telem Group of Companies pending projects. Certainly huge concessions on the part of the Island Government were made.

I heard the bankmanagers laughed all the way back to their banks with the huge profits they made off the deals. RBTT being the biggest winner of all. WIB a lesser winner because it has always been the holding company, MCB's, objective not to let WIB make too much money else it will cost them more to eventually buy out the Wathey's share in the bank.)

So no need to proceed with the deal brokered by Merit with Citibank Group's affiliate who would underwrite Telem's debts.

I am sure Merit will be found meritorious in their claims and the St. Maarten taxpapers will again end up footing the bill. But what I find meritless in this whole affair is the fact that these financial brokers - given the track record of Telem and other government owned companies and even the government of The Netherlands Antilles & Aruba - willingly and knowingly entered into contractual agreement with these banana republic officials we have here in St. Maarten (an almost backward and third world island looking for country status), whereby it was already common knowledge in the financial community and among other financial brokers that eventually this government owned company would default on their obligation by not going ahead with the deal. It is the modus operandi of government owned companies.

Yet they willingly entered into the agreement, given me cause to suspect that it was all about the claim they would eventually file suit for and obviously will be awarded. it is nice to get $2.34 million dollar (3% of $78M) because your contractual party defaulted on the agreement. Who wouldn't want easy money?

User login

Navigation

Poll

Are you more inclined to give your business and money to environmentally and socially aware companies?
Yes, absolutey.
82%
When possible I prefer to.
14%
Not bothered.
4%
Who cares, never.
0%
Total votes: 28

Browse archives

« October 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
      1 2 3 4
7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Syndicate

XML feed