Lagoon Log 20 - Proposed Bridge across the Lagoon is not a solution

By Rueben J Thompson

Love the Lagoon, Environmental Protection in the Caribbean

Increasing road network capacity, by in this case building a bridge across the Simpson Bay Lagoon, in efforts to alleviate traffic jams is not an effective solution for St. Maarten’s traffic related challenges. With the amount of registered vehicles on the island increasing by a minimum of approximately 10% per year since 2003, the planned road network expansion will cease to meet traffic capacity needs in less than 5 years unless government takes measures to curb the increase of vehicles on the island and promote the use of public transportation.

As mentioned in a previous Lagoon Log; Research and experience in numerous countries in the Caribbean and around the world shows that increased road capacity is very quickly filled with “ induced vehicle traffic”. (Traffic Congestion along the Simpson Bay Lagoon Part 1)

Click here to Read More

The proposed bridge across the Lagoon will quickly result in more cars on the road and subsequently more traffic jams as:
• People will take additional trips to the Simpson Bay, Cole Bay or Marigot area seeing that the bridge will cause the destinations to seem more accessible.
• People tend to abandon public transportation and carpools when additional road space is made available, through new road construction or linkages.
• The bridge will stimulate development and commercialization of previously less visited or desirable locations due to increased accessibility.
• The Bridge will partially shift the traffic congestion problem from one side of the Lagoon to the other.

In addition to the abovementioned, building a bridge across the Simpson Bay Lagoon will result in additional pollution of the Lagoon through man made debris and disturb the already fragile seagrass beds and other ecosystems which are only just starting to recover from the dredging which was carried out for the airport expansion.

The proposed Bridge across the Lagoon is a lot less sustainable and much more expensive than the solutions the Tourism Master Plan, the St. Maarten Carrying Capacity Study and other relevant research papers offer for St. Maarten’s and particularly Simpson Bay’s Traffic Congestion challenges. The full range of social, economic and environmental impacts of a bridge across the Lagoon needs to be taken into consideration and weighed against the negligible and short-lived infrastructural benefits (temporary and very minor traffic alleviation) the bridge will provide.

Should government decide to continue with their plans for a bridge across the Simpson Bay Lagoon, the contractors hired to design and/ or build and maintain it will be the only ones to benefit from its existence.

Make sure you read the next Lagoon Log for more answers to your questions and for more information on the Simpson Bay Lagoon.

Rueben J. Thompson
Project Manager Love the Lagoon, Environmental Protection in the Caribbean

Additional Lagoon Logs - By Rueben J Thompson - EPIC

add new comment

Submitted by Revolutionary on Mon, 2008-01-07 11:04.

Stop the madness!!
Anonymous (not verified) | Wed, 2008-01-09 05:18

I know for a fact that if all the cars on SXM would be on the road at the same time, you can walk from roof top to roof top to get where you have to go! It is incredible that no matter what time of day of night you drive on the road you are in a traffic-jam! The madness has got to stop somewhere! They should stop giving out new license plates and motor vehicle registrations immediately! And after that start limiting the amount of cars per household to just 1 car, and also the same for the French side!

SXM is just way to small for the amount of cars that are presently on the road. The solution is not building more roads, but limiting the amount of cars. With all the cars on the road, Philipsburg is a virtual nightmare to go to. You can't find a place to park, the congestion and exhaust fumes from the cars are enough to poison you, let alone the aggravation, stress, accidents and God knows what!

This is an appeal to Government to please start doing something about the amount of cars on the road and stop wasting our tax-payers money on building new roads, bridges etc. Its not helping the problem! You can just as well take our money and flush it down the toilet, the only people that are benefiting from it is Windward Roads, Koop Holding and all other foreign contractors! The only solution you have is to limit the amount of cars on the island, its just too much!!

PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Solution
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2008-01-08 01:58

The solution to the traffic congestion on St. Maarten is very simple and can be implemented within a designated period of time. In Bermuda it's commonplace for each household to have only 1 vehicle. Owning 2 or more vehicles per household is forbidden by law! We wouldn't have to go that far but the vehicle tax can be raised, or that the tax be doubled for a second car (first car normal tax, second car double, third car triple etc.) Also car rentals should be limited in the amount of enterprises that are allowed and also the amount of cars they are allowed to have. This is the only viable solution in stopping this traffic madness in St. Maarten. The more roads that are the built the more roads need to be maintained. Government can't even properly maintain the roads they already have, they want to build more?? What will happen when Government can't maintain the their bridges and they start collapsing??

Only if these types of measures are taken can public transport have a chance to develop into a proper alternative form of transportation. These measures however can only be taken in cooperation with the French Side. Furthermore some sort of toll should be levied from the French for driving on the Dutch Side since the island is literally invaded by French vehicles. I suggest that a toll be levied per vehicle 100 euros per year. If a household has more than 1 vehicle on the French side then for the second car 200 euros per year on top of the 100 for the first vehicle. This should drastically reduce the amount of vehicles on the road.

Although these measures sound drastic, they are necessary. Think of the financial burden that will be lifted from families struggling to maintain their cars. Think of all the things you can do with the extra money by just having 1 car. You can enjoy life more, less headache, less expenses, less stress, more money to go on holidays, to eat healthier food, more money to spend on your children etc.

Think about it, its just my food for thought.....

Solution 1
Anonymous (not verified) | Wed, 2008-01-09 13:21

Very good but the main problem is and will be always our politicians. There are many proposals on the table but they are no capable to handle it because of manpower and many other reasons.
Soon

Unfortunately...
Anonymous (not verified) | Tue, 2008-01-08 07:55

Most sxm'ners would prefer bearing the traffic than giving up the luxury of their cars. And thats a fact.

Unfortunately 1
Anonymous (not verified) | Wed, 2008-01-09 13:30

If govt. can provide a "bus transportations" as in Holland the people will start using the transportation system because you know that wherever you go you will be on time. The The high cost of living will eventually drive us in seeking alternatives to come around. The oil continue to rise and look at your gebe bills. We need discipline
Soon

Unfortunatly having to face
Anonymous (not verified) | Wed, 2008-01-09 05:09

Unfortunately having to face the fact that they will have to eventually give up the luxury of their cars is a fact they will just have to learn to live with.....

Proposed Bridge across the lagoon is not a solution.
Anonymous (not verified) | Mon, 2008-01-07 17:44

Proposed Bridge across the lagoon is not a solution. Banning all private cars is!

As far as I can tell,there is absolutely no need for anyone owning a car. After all, there is nowhere to go.

How about banning all private cars and how about introducing reliable public transport?

How much does is cost to own a car anyway?

Any comments?

Thanks.Janelle

User login

Navigation

Poll

Is Louie Laveist exercising Good Judgement?
Yes
19%
No
81%
Total votes: 21

Recent comments

Browse archives

« December 2008  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Syndicate

XML feed