Again SXM News Network posts a story on Private Eye as its own work, while the New Hope scoop is a production of Today. I don't mind seeing my work here, on the contrary, but at least give Today the credit it is due.
I do not follow dr. Voodoo's argument about 'not asking intimate questions'. Brooks did not want to talk; the facts speak for themselves. There is nothing wrong with the foundation, they just refuse to talk about how they spend a donation they did or did not get, nor are they eager to clarify Laveist's involvement.
O Psilos
Why does SXM News Network steal our work?
O Psilos | Tue, 2007-05-22 11:56
Again SXM News Network posts a story on Private Eye as its own work, while the New Hope scoop is a production of Today. I don't mind seeing my work here, on the contrary, but at least give Today the credit it is due.
I do not follow dr. Voodoo's argument about 'not asking intimate questions'. Brooks did not want to talk; the facts speak for themselves. There is nothing wrong with the foundation, they just refuse to talk about how they spend a donation they did or did not get, nor are they eager to clarify Laveist's involvement.
O Psilos
»