Add new comment

More to this
Anonymous (not verified) | Wed, 2007-06-27 15:20

PE Please do not Take Out the Name in this blog;

The writer of the email did not mention his name: I believe it is JST, has 5 passports and the only reason he is coming forward is because he has a beef with the LH and her husband. He had them do business transaction for him and they robbed him...VINDICTIVE AND REVENGE.
All the other information he gave is because he is a participant to these crimes. He has sinc eleft SXM and is living in Santo Domingo-- Why No Extradition Treaty there.
Every name mentioned in the email of alledged wrong doing is people JST had a problem with.
I will leave it there

Yes, we did change the name you put to it's initials, in the same way we did for the emails which mention the full names of those the writer's accusations are aimed at. We did not think it right to put them as first of all we cannot verify the source of the email or it's charges, and secondly because knowing that the authorities already had these emails they should be given the opportunity to respond, investigate and tell us. Of course, if you want to sign in with a user name and a genuine email address, that may be different.

If this JST is the writer, and you do not give any evidence to say how you know this, then from what we hear, he is a rather unsavory character and is being sought by several govts authorities. In this case then certainly he probably was involved and secondly he probably has some grudge too.

What we want to know, does this then invalidate everything he has to say in his emails and that the charges he makes should be dismissed as coming from a crook who is just out for revenge? Everything he has to say sounds quite plausible and is easily investigated and verified, or discredited.

Sometimes it takes a crook to know what other crooks are doing. It also seems to me that it's possible that people may be trying to sling lots of mud, perhaps deservedly, to discredit the writer in order to discredit the charges. Can you tell us how you know they are from this JST?

SMNN and Taco are on the case, lets see what they come up with.

Reply


*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Make a donation





User login

Navigation

Poll

Are you happy with the direction New Status is going?
Yes, I'm very happy.
5%
I'm comfortable with it.
5%
I have some worries and doubts.
18%
I am very unhappy with it, anxious for the future of the island and people.
23%
Higher Supervision, New Referendum, All 'New Status' Options openly debated please!
50%
Total votes: 22

Recent comments

Browse archives

« January 2009  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
        1 2
4 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Syndicate

XML feed